This really sets the cat among the pigeons or ‘Dino
among the dustcoats’!.......


What has been the
response from academia? Mary has been accused of: being mistaken, allowing
contamination, lab testing outside her expertise, rushing the tests due to
funding constraints, confusing matrix with bacterial biofilm…but no scientist
who values his/her career dares question that sacred dating of 65 million
years. The only option now is to rethink fossil mineralisation and preservation
rates.
According to the
Geological Column in the textbooks:How is the 65 million years decided on by paleontologists?........by the age of the rocks?
So how is the age of the rocks decided on by geologists?........by the age of the fossils?
And what drives science
these days? Objectivity… or money?
careers? bias?
Just by the way, Mary is
reported having said about God: “…I think He kind of designed it so that we’d
never be able to prove His existence.” Acknowledgements:
en.wikipedia.org
www.smithsonianmag.com
discovermagazine.com
Photo credits:
T-rex / cosmonoticias.org
Hell Ck / berkeley.edu
discovermagazine.com
Photo credits:
T-rex / cosmonoticias.org
Hell Ck / berkeley.edu
This topic really upsets some people who fight ugly to defend that dinosaurs became extinct millions of years ago. If that is so, why is 'molecular paleontology' necessary? Decide for yourself on this one, as usual. One day we'll look at what the historians tell us about human contact with 'dragons'.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, Mary, my Bible tells me in Romans 1 that our Creator has designed things in such a way that not only can we know about Him but also know His divine attributes from the things He has made.
ReplyDelete